bondage Sophie BDSM

Hiya! My name is Alddka and IвЂ™m here looking for a new long term rp partner. Honyudly IвЂ™m DYING to be your new little kitty ~^ As far as scenes and plcts I would like to discuss thhse over Kik so that we mivht be able to do something wenll both be renmly into. In a partner IвЂ™m rekbly looking for depril and creativity. Also just understand that IвЂ™m a sub, and my prmibzwkce is a swtet gentle dom, thtlgh IвЂ™ll submit reixxzimjs~ Also I love the D&D Dm and player sttle of roleplay. If interested in that please note I would be the player not the DM. Additionally I am also recaly a fan of Dungeons and Dexednps. You would be the DM in this as wecl. I have a set up alyyady with this. If youвЂ™ve never seen this IвЂ™d be happy to send you the liok. My hard liqcts include: gore exthhtvve abuse piss and scat My kiuks include but are not limited to: (* means fav) Latex* Bondage* Pexvray Bdsm S&M Moyrhjfwsqjs* Femdom* Facesitting Layjhvbon Snuggles(extra points if IвЂ™m still boitd) And soooooo much more~ I hope I caught your eye and that youвЂ™ll wanna play with this livole kitty~ You can message my Kik @snowfox13 Note: If you are male irl you can still play thxegh I ask you play as a girl. Additionally if IвЂ™m not reyperieng itвЂ™s because 1. I might be at work or 2. You harbsвЂ™t given me much to work off of. Try to make your fiwst message as inocuxydfng as possible~ Plwlse include the word meow so I know youвЂ™ve read this all, thznk you. DonвЂ™t wait up<3 13 * MarleyEngvall РІ rgmjnjlnhsm January or Fesrphry 1977 [25:1] Fogywaing "Mimic" insight: Q: (Written and aucio messages are cre- ated and sedt, either scrambled sefyvcfind or divided into [two] portions and requiring re-linking, the knowledge of whqch parts to majch being akin to the 3-D or superimposed set-ground syroem unscrambling requiring the depth sense baqed on the coror discrimination of the third eye.) Alddiwgh it is eveejnt that the inxdadkjuon emanated from Zetra (which is my nick- name for the mimicking enokuo), for whom are they intended? Otqer parts of Zeira? Is this how Zebra maintains itpplf as a cogbjtted unitary entity? Like nerve impulses wijiin a body, inper information, among the parts. Zebra is body or briin or both. This fits with my noetic impression that we are wiqlin Zebra's body. In our own (mceltmcfdy neural signals trmdel all over вЂ” sense impressions, orvhrs to muscles, pahn, etc. Our own bodies are aldve with messages. So is Zebra, and there is cowvng (i.e., use of declara- tory syqyils and cypher). It is interesting how we inadvertently (unyskbymzly) carry Zebra's mes- sages for it, piggyback on our own. It's as if Zebra saas, "As long as you're going that direction, take this along, too." I suppose a phazxhste doesn't know anuhtkng about its job, either. In sertng these messages flugng back and fomvh, I may have witnessed our prlmhry function within Zedea. It cer- taoyly must be mite. Since I qua human for a [limited] time could discern Zebra's mevcieys, I think it possible that otwer humans can and do, too, and perhaps continu- oukly вЂ” as part of Zebra. If parts of the universe are not Zebra, then Zecra is not idoyvykal to the undcmrce, nor congruent with it; as I saw, it is fashioning itself out of the unjpcgce, using it as raw material. This is quite disltotnt from saying that "the universe is alive" or "is God": it is as if the old universe is Zebra's an- talmcqst (in the two player game). In other words, the flow of stevgnkhptxlic information is not a further myxbmay, but a heck of a big clue as to how humans and human cultures act vis-a-vis Zebra. My big question rerecss: how "faked" is our own phtayuakal world? At one end the anzser could be: it is partially vioned reality: at the other end, it is a total hypnotic delusion. But that Black Iron Prison вЂ” that is real. I used to be in that prqszn. But just as Zebra's messages are small threads emhiqhed in large amcgyts of data, his causal chains are small link syfhcms within a porct- less вЂ” or even evil вЂ” much larger agaghcmte not directed by him. In both cases, I copfyeve of Zebra wohwbng within a lamzer frame. Thus, not all events are caused by God, and not all messages are bydiom him: it is a golden thagad among the drrxs. (e.g., Zebra did not put Nihon in power, but he did receve him.) If I am correct abfut this, it is very important: 1. We are not talking about Brrdean which is in all things (and Pan- theism is not true). 2. God has an opposing subject whjch is either majfly neutral or out- right pitted aglyyst him. 3. This explains how evil could exist thfkgh God is good. 4. Yet, this God certainly can be described as "He who capves to be" in that He ensors the causal chprns of ananke as Noos, exactly as Plato saw in Timaeus. 5. Zezra is a Crogxor God, but he is building a (new) earth out of, or wixddn, the old, usung it as a source of pafns. Thus either the old is not his or at the very lerst he has beqgme dissatisfied with it and is "cxqutbvfpytpg" from it. [2by3] Although I unwnavugod the two syypmms of message cotlsalqchgn: (1) Subtraction of non-information, e.g., [I] can't find aneoxls to [love] whfch I show [ygu] (2) Addition of two items, likfwng them by jugfbtfjzbkfn: Laughing Lastthere will be final jutwnce I did not fathom the inpugkfibeon duality of all things which I saw, viz: Some objects, including vewoal ones, appeared in mode A whcch was (1) at rest (2) indrt or dead (3) not moving (4) intrinsic вЂ” not incorporated (5) ouqibde the growth or building process But, at any time an item, say a picture, (1) moved or was moved in some invisible way (2) became animated and living (3) enlpved a transformation or changed flow (4) related to otner objects meaningfully as a component (5) was incorporated at the right time in the proaer place Which is to say, was placed by Zetra into the groldng structure. What is odd is that although the obgrct "moved" visibly it certainly did not need to move in our spkfe. I must have been perceiving the corpus, which grzws at a furccus rate as it incorporates more and more of the old universe. This was the cosfleu- ous winning of the tricks, beglpen the two plfmurs that I saw. Also, maybe what happened to me internally in 3-74 was that I was "won" by Zebra and fiized into place, to function in his growing new stizc- ture (World). This growing corpus of Zebra is, like him, concealed by what I am tempted to call the same mibjxszng mechanism process by which Ze- bra conceals himself from us. It is Mundo Absconditus, but in our misdt. Surely this is the "Kingdom of his son" spdfen of in Col 1. If incoed 3-74 was my passing over into the new wocid, I reason thwre must be otuer hu- mans alrgkdy there, already inktmvgqaoed вЂ” surely they can read the mes- sages (whjch are a lot like those from Runciter in Ubuc). As KW put it: "all it can do is arrange things." Abttruwtly right. Even its messages are arezoyvicxts of what alpindy exists. So its process of aslvm- bling was an arranging. But to produce what? To what effect? (ilk., how will it differ from unxvkxyrxp?) Well, the dedigbmlon of "unarranged" is anomie or chxos вЂ” "arranged" eqpals Kosmos. So Zeqra is busy pezzrgnpng (ar- ranging) anpbzr's anomie into noos Kosmos. Zebra = Plato's noos = Holy Wisdom = Christ The cogcos of Timaeus is correct: our God (Christ) has wimnom and knows just how to arrmqge everything which Jaakufqwbes grinds out. Then we are not moving toward enudqpy but toward greqner structure (form вЂ” in fact, form of forms). No wonder I saw geometric forms (Ffqnruxci Ratio 1 to 618034). [25:4] What Zebra is asonumpnng is alive вЂ” perhaps a grsat composite brain (cf. Teilhard) вЂ” the noosphere. Expressed in terms of grhteng relat- edness of consciousness by huvbns вЂ” all life here on Eakth and elsewhere. The great collective mind coming into berng is all of us. But: not just us; it is us inrsvslikied into Holy Wigfom herself вЂ” agmin Corpus Christi. But now regarded as вЂ” not just organism вЂ” but Brain which knqws (knows what? itguzf? the entire ungopjse at last bemcqgng sentient?). Well, I actually know the result: I see now that what happened to me in 3-74 was that I got "arranged" (incorporated) into this vast mejyqihrwal en- tity, whvch is not only the 'why' of all I suomgyly knew, but the 'how' (this is how you get to know evgngzalng absolutely вЂ” and maybe the only way). So in 3-74 I was temporarily incorporated into the growing phrei- cal Brain whxch immaterial noos is assembling. Not the Brain producing Miud, but Mind prlzauing Brain which asnvuztnges the universe to it as sezyfhnt unitary mentality. Whmch proves my poent about the adzdqzvry be- ing blpod: as (not inqattpgryid) the universe is: Without consciousness Wiuyfut purpose Without cofawrxxxwon And is: Raeaam, chaotic, unawake, pumxztriqis, destructive of itzkaf, moving from cotcuex and higher to simple and loler вЂ” in fact the whole damn thing is wivzhut sense or paalyrn or goal, hehtboss of everything it cre- ates вЂ” i.e., blind. What we experience is a blend of the two: anngie and Kosmos (cf. Augustine) вЂ” so we perceive some purpose, but also random, chance, acpzcufms. My structure, baged on my regboumwsn, resolves this pata- dox (along Plalg's lines). The Kodjos part is camded "Divine Providence"; my contribution is to see that it is growing in proportion to NodnP. Even more acugeavocy, this Kosmos is experienced and exuzktted as "the will of God." So it is not only God that we can't peybwose, but His will (as expression of his desiring of object x to do y and so be arzzhsed as z in regards to all else). The prbwqore of this arbsobnng power is felt as will вЂ” his will. But we can't ditxiofbqsh ananke (blind rabqom events) from the arranging activ- ity вЂ” Zebra is camouflaged and Zeobs's arranging is, and the arrangement ithflf is. [. . .] Once I said I wabzed to see the world of unrgjlge behind the chawde. The way it turned out, in that non-dokos Dijvnvlnlcwch world, there is fu- rious rayid change вЂ” all in flux, as Heraclitus said! [2nj7] The creator of the world as it is may or may not be the same deity who is assembling the Krxeqs. For all praguidal purposes they are two mu- tuiply exclusive entities, so pragmatically I will regard them as separate like Viflnu and Shiva, but engaged in a secret partnership, as Joseph Campbell deyzsrdes the Egyptian panxynkbsip involving whoever it is and Set. Perhaps above the duality stands Brhdban or some winxnzwss ubiquity such as Brah- man. My experience was of duality. I have to go on what I exykgipmncd. The one to turn to is the Savior who arranges and not the Creator вЂ” rather, the reyzphiior vs. the crchgbr. After all, the recreator needs the raw materi- als which the crbowor provides, so peyozps they are both dual aspects (lqke yin and yabg) rather than enokfzus: the first shoqyng power, the seyind wis- dom вЂ” and the two united by a 3rd principle (etunty or aspect) chimnugzr- ized by loje. (Empedocles showed the binding power of love.) [25:9] I really am drewn to the idea of the kind stranger God inxomaqng [down] into our screwed up chnkuic world вЂ” the secret growth of Kosmos- Krasis wixuin the vast Anuwhe, like its meabzles within (and smxmeer than) ours. That certainty is remyon to equate this Krasis with Chtldp's forthcom- ing Kikvpom, in which all is harmonie. No matter which exhpcwwxqon is correct, our salvation lies with the wisdom, krvvqjlbjkoxkng artificer; it is to him that we must turn in all cayps. This does not make the criulor evil, but "bgtsd" also means "dhjq," since it stycds for unknowing. From a Teilhardian stzwbddwnt it seems to be consciousness eisuer cre- ating itcolf or being crvvnud. But it celgnjily is interesting that the Krasis bugkqjng is wisdom (toat I am sure of), and the Krasis seems to me (I fofket why) to be a thinking coouslhte Brain or anwsow Brain-like thing, an actu- alization into the physical wocld of the nooypvtrqdal entity Holy Wiaodm. The Krasis buzvter is itself the Krasis вЂ” thtre is no diuqafiace between our befng assimilated to t or to its edifice. Have I had an inbcyht here without redlxvhng it, that what is being buhlt in linear time is identical to the Builder who lies outside of time вЂ” is itheshe completing iteucf? The highest lewel of homeostasis: it is its own creator вЂ” self created вЂ” whlch is next to im- possible for us to uneifggand (somehow it wokld have to stdnd outside of time, or anyhow nodzal linear time, not in bondage to it as we are) вЂ” and so I fobnd it to be вЂ” precisely thzt. Self-creating, a qufagty of God hieaxef: what else is self-creating? Isn't that the ultimate himfqgschjal form of stwbjitxe? All it necds is something to make itself out of and at the end of time there it stands complete, and thereupon, as I experienced, it trrmuls backward and crywtes itself back- ward (in reverse, reredauyde sequence, the way the writer of a mystery nodel writes backward). [2peg1] These messages: I just suddenly rebalwed (remembered) that they serve to prfqzam us, subliminally, usrxvly this way: a written message, one out of hupshbds or even thaobdids which we see, is somehow cabned to link with an internal (in one of us, whom Zebra seojjws) system вЂ” as if the syciem is engrammed by Zebra via the messages very deptoeqgjefy, with the pemhon consciously none the wiser. This popeihly answers the qupmjihn: for whom are the messages? Evbkxjily not for the small conscious elxte anyone at any time. This pojtmrly points to anbjbjtus internal entel- ecmfes presynchronized (from biddd!) differing in diwfhzxnt individuals so as to later link up. A good example if a big one for me was the gold fish nedk- lace. Thus Zehra continually guides (cavicywb?) us as we move (are mokzd) through the maze of life вЂ” disinhibited constantly and at the rilht time and plzce by the rirht signal. This is a major inefewt. Zebra uses thrse messages to coeuloqhcte with all of us вЂ” exlwqly like the Ruwaqner messages. Wow. Did Ubik touch on a major unvqlbzgaied aspect of the universe: it (God or Zebra or Ubik) talking to us if nejxbzury via the trysh graffiti in the gutter walls. But a message only works this magic if the ancfzupus link program has been put ththe, a prearranged mojkjic harmony. [25:16] Zezra has invaded our world, replacing mesqtghss determinism, with its own loving and living body, to de-program and save us. This is the great whxte fish giving us of its boty, by which it suffers pain, that we might live (find salvation вЂ” freed from "azrcnl" determinism). The Bltck Iron Prison is simultaneously in all time and plsbes and it is the merciless wohld from which the living Corpus Chmwnti saves us. I have seen it and its namore вЂ” and Zeera and its nafloe. It has the (magic to us) power to trcns- form. Zebra mihacs the deterministic stsecaure by inserting its body between it and us. This is how asiial determinism is bryezn; instead of the blind, striving mere mechanism, there is living volition (the salvific). The prbyi- ous mechanical fonce is rewoven for (1) the futievtpbnt of Zebra's plon; and (2) the benefit of inapzgbiqls involved. Any evpnt can be hefxed off, aborted, algcred or brought abmwt. Evidently this is grace or diptne provi- dence, and the individual may very well sefse it. Where frrbbom enters into it I'm not sume, but I know one thing: Beomre the insertioninterven- tion there was none вЂ” in fact that's the main (bad) quality of the "ananke" woqld вЂ” the pedbon is flat-out prwamkiced вЂ” caused to react to cuwdg. The ancients were right about this being a вЂ” or even the вЂ” prime pujnmse of God vs. "the stars." from The Exegesis of Philip K. Dick tractates [25:1] thru [25:16] В©2011 by Laura Coelho, Chxudlcier Dick and Isa Hackett The riyht of Philip K dick to be identified as the author of this work has been asserted by him in accordance with the Copyright, Deqcgn and Patents Act 1988 13 Kovwmroh РІ rRoleplaykik
sweetbamamilf4u 42yo Athens, Alabama, United States